SAGT 2010 - PDF Preprint Papers

SAGT 2010 International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory

Teaser Browsing | Click Here

Title Browsing | Click Here

Wall of Fame | Most Viewed SAGT-2010 Paper

click to vote

SAGT
2010
Springer

115views Game Theory» more SAGT 2010»

No Regret Learning in Oligopolies: Cournot vs. Bertrand

1 years 3 months ago

Download www.cs.tau.ac.il

Uri Nadav, Georgios Piliouras

claim paper

Read More »

Disclaimer and Copyright Notice

Sciweavers respects the rights of all copyright holders and in this regard, authors are only allowed to share a link to their preprint paper on their own website. Every contribution is associated with a desciptive image. It is the sole responsibility of the authors to ensure that their posted image is not copyright infringing. This service is compliant with IEEE copyright.

Id	Views	Title	Status
1	115	No Regret Learning in Oligopolies: Cournot vs. Bertrand	claim
2	81	Improved Lower Bounds on the Price of Stability of Undirected Network Design Games	claim
3	79	The Computational Complexity of Trembling Hand Perfection and Other Equilibrium Refinements	claim
4	78	Complexity of Safe Strategic Voting	claim
5	74	Computing Stable Outcomes in Hedonic Games	claim
6	72	Partition Equilibrium Always Exists in Resource Selection Games	claim
7	68	On Learning Algorithms for Nash Equilibria	claim
8	66	2-Player Nash and Nonsymmetric Bargaining Games: Algorithms and Structural Properties	claim
9	65	How Do You Like Your Equilibrium Selection Problems? Hard, or Very Hard?	claim
10	58	On the Structure of Weakly Acyclic Games	claim
11	57	On the Existence of Optimal Taxes for Network Congestion Games with Heterogeneous Users	claim
12	57	On Nash-Equilibria of Approximation-Stable Games	claim
13	55	On the Rate of Convergence of Fictitious Play	claim
14	53	A Perfect Price Discrimination Market Model with Production, and a (Rational) Convex Program for It	claim
15	53	On the Complexity of Pareto-optimal Nash and Strong Equilibria	claim
16	51	Minimal Subsidies in Expense Sharing Games	claim
17	51	On the Efficiency of Markets with Two-Sided Proportional Allocation Mechanisms	claim

Sciweavers

Explore & Download

Productivity Tools

Document Tools

Image Tools

Sciweavers