Sciweavers

COMMA
2010

Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution

12 years 10 months ago
Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution
Abstract. We propose an argumentation framework for modelling jury-based dispute resolution where the dispute parties present their arguments before a judge and a jury. While the judge as the arbiter of law determines the legal permissibility of the presented arguments the jurors as triers of facts determine their probable weights. Such a framework is based on two key components: classical argumentation frameworks containing legally permissible arguments and probabilistic spaces assigning probable weights to arguments. A juror's probability space is represented by a set of possible worlds coupled with a probabilistic measure computed by assumption-based argumentation framework using grounded semantics. Keywords. Probabilistic argumentation, jury-based dispute resolution
Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang
Added 14 May 2011
Updated 14 May 2011
Type Journal
Year 2010
Where COMMA
Authors Phan Minh Dung, Phan Minh Thang
Comments (0)