Sciweavers

ECSQARU
2007
Springer

Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism

13 years 9 months ago
Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
Abstract. The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper, we contribute to this kind of analysis by providing a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics) using both a weak and a strong skepticism relation. Key words: Argumentation semantics, Skepticism
Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
Added 07 Jun 2010
Updated 07 Jun 2010
Type Conference
Year 2007
Where ECSQARU
Authors Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
Comments (0)