Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

9

AAAI
1996

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

117views Intelligent Agents» more AAAI 1996»

Comparing Agent Modeling For Language and Action

13 years 5 months ago

Comparing Agent Modeling For Language and Action

Download www.aaai.org

Wepresent our approach to agent modelingfor communication, and compareit to an approach to agent modelingfor other types of action. The comparisonshould be instructive since both approaches are implementedin the sameproblemsolving architecture, face similar application domainrequirements, and address the samegeneral problem of comprehension. Also, we show how for discourseprocessing,it is possibleto havethe benefits of viewingagents in terms of their befiefs and intentions withoutsacrificing real-time performanceand reactivity.

Nancy Green, Jill Lehman

Real-time Traffic

AAAI 1996 | Agent Modelingfor | Agent Modelingfor Communication | Face Similar Application | Intelligent Agents |

claim paper

Related Content

» Its Not Just Goals All the Way Down Its Activities All the Way Down

» Comparative Study of Arabic and French Statistical Language Models

» Encoding Probabilistic Causal Model in Probabilistic Action Language

» A stochastic language for modelling opponent agents

» A Comparative Analysis of iBased AgentOriented Modeling Languages

» Walk the Talk Connecting Language Knowledge and Action in Route Instructions

» Using the UML 20 activity diagram to model agent plans and actions

» An Agent Language with Destructive Assignment and ModelTheoretic Semantics

» Comparative Semantics for a RealTime Programming Language with Integration

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	02 Nov 2010
Updated	02 Nov 2010
Type	Conference
Year	1996
Where	AAAI
Authors	Nancy Green, Jill Lehman

Comments (0)