Sciweavers

Share
CSDA
2010

A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments

9 years 8 months ago
A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments
Various design and model selection methods are available for supersaturated designs having more factors than runs but little research is available on their comparison and evaluation. In this paper, simulated experiments are used to evaluate the use of E(s2)-optimal and Bayesian D-optimal designs, and to compare three analysis strategies representing regression, shrinkage and a novel model-averaging procedure. Suggestions are made for choosing the values of the tuning constants for each approach. Findings include that (i) the preferred analysis is via shrinkage; (ii) designs with similar numbers of runs and factors can be e_ective for a considerable number of active e_ects of only moderate size; and (iii) unbalanced designs can perform well. Some comments are made on the performance of the design and analysis methods when e_ect sparsity does not hold.
Christopher J. Marley, David C. Woods
Added 09 Dec 2010
Updated 09 Dec 2010
Type Journal
Year 2010
Where CSDA
Authors Christopher J. Marley, David C. Woods
Comments (0)
books