Sciweavers

ACL
2008

Contradictions and Justifications: Extensions to the Textual Entailment Task

13 years 6 months ago
Contradictions and Justifications: Extensions to the Textual Entailment Task
The third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge (RTE-3) contained an optional task that extended the main entailment task by requiring a system to make three-way entailment decisions (entails, contradicts, neither) and to justify its response. Contradiction was rare in the RTE-3 test set, occurring in only about 10% of the cases, and systems found accurately detecting it difficult. Subsequent analysis of the results shows a test set must contain many more entailment pairs for the three-way decision task than the traditional two-way task to have equal confidence in system comparisons. Each of six human judges representing eventual end users rated the quality of a justification by assigning "understandability" and "correctness" scores. Ratings of the same justification across judges differed significantly, signaling the need for a better characterization of the justification task.
Ellen M. Voorhees
Added 29 Oct 2010
Updated 29 Oct 2010
Type Conference
Year 2008
Where ACL
Authors Ellen M. Voorhees
Comments (0)