Join Our Newsletter

Free Online Productivity Tools
i2Speak
i2Symbol
i2OCR
iTex2Img
iWeb2Print
iWeb2Shot
i2Type
iPdf2Split
iPdf2Merge
i2Bopomofo
i2Pinyin
i2Cantonese
i2Cangjie
i2Arabic
i2Style
i2Image
i2PDF
iLatex2Rtf
Sci2ools

ICMLA

2007

2007

For both single probability estimation trees (PETs) and ensembles of such trees, commonly employed class probability estimates correct the observed relative class frequencies in each leaf to avoid anomalies caused by small sample sizes. The effect of such corrections in random forests of PETs is investigated, and the use of the relative class frequency is compared to using two corrected estimates, the Laplace estimate and the m-estimate. An experiment with 34 datasets from the UCI repository shows that estimating class probabilities using relative class frequency clearly outperforms both using the Laplace estimate and the m-estimate with respect to accuracy, area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Brier score. Hence, in contrast to what is commonly employed for PETs and ensembles of PETs, these results strongly suggest that a non-corrected probability estimate should be used in random forests of PETs. The experiment further shows that learning random forests of PETs using relative class fr...

Related Content

Added |
29 Oct 2010 |

Updated |
29 Oct 2010 |

Type |
Conference |

Year |
2007 |

Where |
ICMLA |

Authors |
Henrik Boström |

Comments (0)