Evidence Contrary to the Statistical View of Boosting

9 years 5 months ago
Evidence Contrary to the Statistical View of Boosting
The statistical perspective on boosting algorithms focuses on optimization, drawing parallels with maximum likelihood estimation for logistic regression. In this paper we present empirical evidence that raises questions about this view. Although the statistical perspective provides a theoretical framework within which it is possible to derive theorems and create new algorithms in general contexts, we show that there remain many unanswered important questions. Furthermore, we provide examples that reveal crucial flaws in the many practical suggestions and new methods that are derived from the statistical view. We perform carefully designed experiments using simple simulation models to illustrate some of these flaws and their practical consequences.
David Mease, Abraham Wyner
Added 13 Dec 2010
Updated 13 Dec 2010
Type Journal
Year 2008
Where JMLR
Authors David Mease, Abraham Wyner
Comments (0)