Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

9

CLEF
2004
Springer

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

134views Information Technology» more CLEF 2004»

Mono- and Crosslingual Retrieval Experiments at the University of Hildesheim

13 years 9 months ago

Mono- and Crosslingual Retrieval Experiments at the University of Hildesheim

Download www.clef-campaign.org

In this year’s participation we continued to evaluate open source information retrieval software. We used mainly the system Lucene and experimented with some of the most effective optimization strategies applied in CLEF. The effectiveness of open source and other free tools can be enhanced by these optimization strategies. For most languages, blind relevance feedback leads to considerable improvement. Indexing strategies with n-grams have not led to improvements within Lucene.

René Hackl, Thomas Mandl, Christa Womser-Ha

Real-time Traffic

CLEF 2004 | Effective Optimization Strategies | Open Source | Optimization Strategies |

claim paper

Related Content

» AdHoc Mono and Bilingual Retrieval Experiments at the University of Hildesheim

» Robust Retrieval Experiments at the University of Hildesheim

» Robust AdHoc Retrieval Experiments with French and English at the University of Hildesheim

» Multilingual Retrieval Experiments with MIMOR at the University of Hildesheim

» Patent Retrieval Experiments in the Context of the CLEF IP Track 2009

» Blind Relevance Feedback and Named Entity Based Query Expansion for Geographic Retrieval a...

» HITS and Misses Combining BM25 with HITS for Expert Search

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	01 Jul 2010
Updated	01 Jul 2010
Type	Conference
Year	2004
Where	CLEF
Authors	René Hackl, Thomas Mandl, Christa Womser-Hacker

Comments (0)