Sciweavers

KR
1992
Springer

Reasoning About Indefinite Actions

13 years 8 months ago
Reasoning About Indefinite Actions
In this paper, we view planning as a special case of reasoning about indefinite actions. We treat actions as predicates defined over a linear temporal order. This formalism permits the representation of concurrent activpose we have a set of abstract actions defined by Horn clauses from a set of basic actions. Let us assume that an abstract action has occurred, and ask whether a given condition is entailed by all the basic actions that constitute . A countermodel to this hypothetical implication is then a plan for "doing and avoiding ." We propose a formalization of this problem using circumscription, and argue that this is the correct formalization if our action definitions include recursive rules. We then investigate two techniques for solving the problem: (1) a special type of inductive proof procedure, which is sound but not complete; and (2) a decision procedure that works for an interesting subclass of the general problem. Because of the use of recursive rules in our...
L. Thorne McCarty, Ron van der Meyden
Added 10 Aug 2010
Updated 10 Aug 2010
Type Conference
Year 1992
Where KR
Authors L. Thorne McCarty, Ron van der Meyden
Comments (0)