Reducing Reliance on Relevance Judgments for System Comparison by Using Expectation-Maximization

Abstract. Relevance judgments are often the most expensive part of information retrieval evaluation, and techniques for comparing retrieval systems using fewer relevance judgments have received significant attention in recent years. This paper proposes a novel system comparison method using an expectationmaximization algorithm. In the expectation step, real-valued pseudo-judgments are estimated from a set of system results. In the maximization step, new system weights are learned from a combination of a limited number of actual human judgments and system pseudo-judgments for the other documents. The method can work without any human judgments, and is able to improve its accuracy by incrementally adding human judgments. Experiments using TREC Ad Hoc collections demonstrate strong correlations with system rankings using pooled human judgments, and comparison with existing baselines indicates that the new method achieves the same comparison reliability with fewer human judgments.

• Type: Journal
• Year: 2014
• Where: ECIR
• Authors: Ning Gao, William Webber, Douglas W. Oard
• Keywords: ECIR 2014, Information Technology