Sciweavers

Share
PODC
2015
ACM

Safety-Liveness Exclusion in Distributed Computing

3 years 3 months ago
Safety-Liveness Exclusion in Distributed Computing
The history of distributed computing is full of trade-offs between safety and liveness. For instance, one of the most celebrated results in the field, namely the impossibility of consensus in an asynchronous system basically says that we cannot devise an algorithm that deterministically ensures consensus agreement and validity (i.e., safety) on the one hand, and consensus wait-freedom (i.e., liveness) on the other hand. The motivation of this work is to study the extent to which safety and liveness properties inherently exclude each other. More specifically, we ask, given any safety property S, whether we can determine the strongest (resp. weakest) liveness property that can (resp. cannot) be achieved with S. We show that, maybe surprisingly, the answers to these safety-liveness exclusion questions are in general negative. This has several ramifications in various distributed computing contexts. In the context of consensus for example, this means that it is impossible to determine ...
Victor Bushkov, Rachid Guerraoui
Added 16 Apr 2016
Updated 16 Apr 2016
Type Journal
Year 2015
Where PODC
Authors Victor Bushkov, Rachid Guerraoui
Comments (0)
books