Sciweavers

SYNTHESE
2010

Two contextualist fallacies

13 years 2 months ago
Two contextualist fallacies
I examine the radical contextualists’ two main arguments for the semantic underdeterminacy thesis, according to which all, or almost all, English sentences lack context-independent truth conditions. I show that both arguments are fallacious. The first argument, which I call the fallacy of the many understandings, mistakenly infers that a sentence S is semantically incomplete from the fact that S can be used to mean different things in different contexts. The second argument, which I call the open texture fallacy, wrongly concludes that a sentence S lacks context-independent truth conditions from the fact that there are circumstances in which the truth value of S would be indeterminate. I do however defend the claim that a certain class of sentences not containing any indexicals do lack context-independent truth conditions, and put forward an argument to that effect. But this argument, as I show, does not generalize to all sentences, and thus fails to support the semantic underdeterm...
Martin Montminy
Added 30 Jan 2011
Updated 30 Jan 2011
Type Journal
Year 2010
Where SYNTHESE
Authors Martin Montminy
Comments (0)