Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time)

Current practice in Human Computer Interaction as encouraged by educational institutes, academic review processes, and institutions with usability groups advocate usability evaluation as a critical part of every design process. This is for good reason: usability evaluation has a significant role to play when conditions warrant it. Yet evaluation can be ineffective and even harmful if naively done `by rule' rather than `by thought'. If done during early stage design, it can mute creative ideas that do not conform to current interface norms. If done to test radical innovations, the many interface issues that would likely arise from an immature technology can quash what could have been an inspired vision. If done to validate an academic prototype, it may incorrectly suggest a design's scientific worthiness rather than offer a meaningful critique of how it would be adopted and used in everyday practice. If done without regard to how cultures adopt technology over time, then...

• Type: Conference
• Year: 2008
• Where: CHI
• Authors: Saul Greenberg, William Buxton
• Keywords: CHI 2008, Groups Advocate Usability, Human Computer Interaction, Keywords Usability Testing, Usability Evaluation