96 search results - page 2 / 20 » An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge... |
COMMA
2010
13 years 29 days ago
2010
In this paper we define a recursive semantics for warrant in a general defeasible argumentation framework by formalizing a notion of collective (non-binary) conflict among argumen...
ICTAI
2009
IEEE
13 years 3 months ago
2009
IEEE
The paper discusses a new approach to merging conflicting propositional knowledge bases which builds on the idea that consistency can often be restored by interpreting proposition...
ARGMAS
2008
Springer
13 years 8 months ago
2008
Springer
Norms represent what ought to be done, and their fulfillment can be seen as benefiting the overall system, society or organisation. However, individual agent goals (desire) may con...
SUM
2009
Springer
14 years 16 days ago
2009
Springer
Abstract. Logic-based argumentation offers an approach to querying and revising multiple ontologies that are inconsistent or incoherent. A common assumption for logic-based argumen...
AAAI
2000
13 years 7 months ago
2000
There are a number of frameworks for modelling argumentation in logic. They incorporate formal representation of individual arguments and techniques for comparing conflicting argu...