Sciweavers

55 search results - page 1 / 11
» Assessing the Costs of Sampling Methods in Active Learning f...
Sort
View
ACL
2008
13 years 5 months ago
Assessing the Costs of Sampling Methods in Active Learning for Annotation
Traditional Active Learning (AL) techniques assume that the annotation of each datum costs the same. This is not the case when annotating sequences; some sequences will take longe...
Robbie Haertel, Eric K. Ringger, Kevin D. Seppi, J...
LREC
2008
119views Education» more  LREC 2008»
13 years 5 months ago
Assessing the Costs of Machine-Assisted Corpus Annotation through a User Study
Fixed, limited budgets often constrain the amount of expert annotation that can go into the construction of annotated corpora. Estimating the cost of annotation is the first step ...
Eric K. Ringger, Marc Carmen, Robbie Haertel, Kevi...
EMNLP
2009
13 years 2 months ago
How well does active learning
Machine involvement has the potential to speed up language documentation. We assess this potential with timed annotation experiments that consider annotator expertise, example sel...
Jason Baldridge, Alexis Palmer
NAACL
2004
13 years 5 months ago
Ensemble-based Active Learning for Parse Selection
Supervised estimation methods are widely seen as being superior to semi and fully unsupervised methods. However, supervised methods crucially rely upon training sets that need to ...
Miles Osborne, Jason Baldridge
COLING
2010
12 years 11 months ago
A Comparison of Models for Cost-Sensitive Active Learning
Active Learning (AL) is a selective sampling strategy which has been shown to be particularly cost-efficient by drastically reducing the amount of training data to be manually ann...
Katrin Tomanek, Udo Hahn