24 search results - page 2 / 5 » Belief dynamics and defeasible argumentation in rational age... |
ARGMAS
2004
Springer
13 years 11 months ago
2004
Springer
Negotiation can be conceived as the exchange of messages among self-interested agents in order to settle on an agreement over a given issue. They decide which messages to send acco...
LADS
2007
Springer
13 years 11 months ago
2007
Springer
A key challenge for agent architectures and programming paradigms is to account for defeasible reasoning over mental attitudes and to provide associated conflict resolution mechan...
ATAL
2007
Springer
13 years 11 months ago
2007
Springer
In this work, we introduce a framework where defeasible argumentation is used for reasoning about beliefs, desires and intentions. A dialectical filtering process is introduced i...
ARGMAS
2009
Springer
14 years 21 hour ago
2009
Springer
Abstract. This paper presents an argumentation mechanism for reconciling conflicts between planning agents related to plan proposals, which are caused by inconsistencies between b...
AAAI
2007
13 years 7 months ago
2007
Here, we define a framework where defeasible argumentation is used for reasoning about beliefs, desires and intentions. A dialectical filtering process is introduced to obtain a...