Sciweavers

12 search results - page 1 / 3
» Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argum...
Sort
View
COMMA
2006
13 years 6 months ago
Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argumentation semantics
In the context of Dung's theory of abstract argumentation frameworks, the comparison between different semantics is often carried out by resorting to some specific examples co...
Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
AI
2007
Springer
13 years 4 months ago
On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
The increasing variety of semantics proposed in the context of Dung’s theory of argumentation makes more and more inadequate the example-based approach commonly adopted for eval...
Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin
ICAIL
2011
ACM
12 years 4 months ago
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation
A formal two-phase model of democratic policy deliberation is presented, in which in the first phase sufficient and necessary criteria for proposals to be accepted are determine...
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken, Wietske V...
LREC
2010
196views Education» more  LREC 2010»
13 years 6 months ago
An Evaluation of Predicate Argument Clustering using Pseudo-Disambiguation
Schulte im Walde et al. (2008) presented a novel approach to semantic verb classication. The predicate argument model (PAC) presented in their paper models selectional preferences...
Christian Scheible
IJCAI
2007
13 years 6 months ago
Semantic Precision and Recall for Ontology Alignment Evaluation
In order to evaluate ontology matching algorithms it is necessary to confront them with test ontologies and to compare the results with some reference. The most prominent comparis...
Jérôme Euzenat