Sciweavers

7 search results - page 1 / 2
» Inconsistency in deception for defense
Sort
View
NSPW
2006
ACM
13 years 10 months ago
Inconsistency in deception for defense
The use of deception is one of many defensive techniques being explored today. In the past, defenders of systems have used deception haphazardly, but now researchers are developin...
Vicentiu Neagoe, Matt Bishop
ACSAC
2004
IEEE
13 years 8 months ago
Designing Good Deceptions in Defense of Information Systems
Since attackers trust computer systems to tell them the truth, it may be effective for those systems to lie or mislead. This could waste the attacker's resources while permit...
Neil C. Rowe
HICSS
2006
IEEE
142views Biometrics» more  HICSS 2006»
13 years 10 months ago
Measuring the Effectiveness of Honeypot Counter-Counterdeception
Honeypots are computer systems that try to fool cyberattackers into thinking they are ordinary computer systems, when in fact they are designed solely to collect data about attack...
Neil C. Rowe
WISEC
2010
ACM
13 years 11 months ago
Automating the injection of believable decoys to detect snooping
We propose a novel trap-based architecture for enterprise networks that detects “silent” attackers who are eavesdropping network traffic. The primary contributions of our work...
Brian M. Bowen, Vasileios P. Kemerlis, Pratap V. P...
SOUPS
2009
ACM
13 years 11 months ago
Conditioned-safe ceremonies and a user study of an application to web authentication
We introduce the notion of a conditioned-safe ceremony. A “ceremony” is similar to the conventional notion of a protocol, except that a ceremony explicitly includes human part...
Chris Karlof, J. D. Tygar, David Wagner