Sciweavers

45 search results - page 2 / 9
» Modeling Suppositions in Users' Arguments
Sort
View
AAMAS
2008
Springer
13 years 5 months ago
Agents that argue and explain classifications
Argumentation is a promising approach used by autonomous agents for reasoning about inconsistent/incomplete/uncertain knowledge, based on the construction and the comparison of ar...
Leila Amgoud, Mathieu Serrurier
AI
2006
Springer
13 years 5 months ago
Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments
Evaluative arguments are pervasive in natural human communication. In countless situations people attempt to advise or persuade their interlocutors that something is desirable (vs...
Giuseppe Carenini, Johanna D. Moore
CLIMA
2007
13 years 6 months ago
Fuzzy Argumentation for Trust
In an open Multi-Agent System, the goals of agents acting on behalf of their owners often conflict with each other. Therefore, a personal agent protecting the interest of a single...
Ruben Stranders, Mathijs de Weerdt, Cees Witteveen
CONTEXT
1999
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
Putting Similarity Assessments into Context: Matching Functions with the User's Intended Operations
This paper presents a practical application of context for the evaluation of semantic similarity. The work is based on a new model for the assessment of semantic similarity among ...
M. Andrea Rodríguez, Max J. Egenhofer
COGSCI
2004
136views more  COGSCI 2004»
13 years 4 months ago
Generation and evaluation of user tailored responses in multimodal dialogue
When people engage in conversation, they tailor their utterances to their conversational partners, whether these partners are other humans or computational systems. This tailoring...
Marilyn A. Walker, Steve Whittaker, Amanda Stent, ...