Sciweavers

26 search results - page 3 / 6
» SpecDiff: debugging formal specifications
Sort
View
ICSE
2008
IEEE-ACM
14 years 6 months ago
On the automation of fixing software bugs
Software Testing can take up to half of the resources of the development of new software. Although there has been a lot of work on automating the testing phase, fixing a bug after...
Andrea Arcuri
DAC
2010
ACM
13 years 9 months ago
Scalable specification mining for verification and diagnosis
Effective system verification requires good specifications. The lack of sufficient specifications can lead to misses of critical bugs, design re-spins, and time-to-market slips. I...
Wenchao Li, Alessandro Forin, Sanjit A. Seshia
ERSHOV
2006
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
An ASM Semantics of Token Flow in UML 2 Activity Diagrams
Abstract. The token flow semantics of UML 2 activity diagrams is formally defined using Abstract State Machines. Interruptible activity regions and multiplicity bounds for pins are...
Stefan Sarstedt, Walter Guttmann
ICSE
2009
IEEE-ACM
14 years 6 months ago
Automatically finding patches using genetic programming
Automatic repair of programs has been a longstanding goal in software engineering, yet debugging remains a largely manual process. We introduce a fully automated method for locati...
Westley Weimer, ThanhVu Nguyen, Claire Le Goues, S...
RE
2001
Springer
13 years 10 months ago
Events and Constraints: A Graphical Editor for Capturing Logic Requirements of Programs
A logic model checker can be an effective tool for debugging software applications. A stumbling block can be that model checking tools expect the user to supply a formal statement...
Margaret H. Smith, Gerard J. Holzmann, Kousha Etes...