Sciweavers

8 search results - page 1 / 2
» Transaction Logic with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
Sort
View
ICLP
2011
Springer
12 years 8 months ago
Transaction Logic with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
Transaction Logic is an extension of classical logic that gracefully integrates both declarative and procedural knowledge and has proved itself as a powerful formalism for many ad...
Paul Fodor, Michael Kifer
ICLP
2009
Springer
14 years 5 months ago
Logic Programming with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
We define logic programs with defaults and argumentation theories, a new framework that unifies most of the earlier proposals for defeasible reasoning in logic programming. We pres...
Hui Wan, Benjamin N. Grosof, Michael Kifer, Paul F...
KI
1995
Springer
13 years 8 months ago
What Is a Skeptical Proof?
Abstract. We investigate the task of skeptically reasoning in extensionbased, nonmonotonic logics by concentrating on general argumentation theories. The restricted applicability o...
Michael Thielscher
RR
2010
Springer
13 years 3 months ago
Defeasibility in Answer Set Programs via Argumentation Theories
Defeasible reasoning has been studied extensively in the last two decades and many different and dissimilar approaches are currently on the table. This multitude of ideas has made...
Hui Wan, Michael Kifer, Benjamin N. Grosof
IJCAI
1989
13 years 5 months ago
Preferred Subtheories: An Extended Logical Framework for Default Reasoning
We present a general framework for defining nonmonotonic systems based on the notion of preferred maximal consistent subsets of the premises. This framework subsumes David Poole&#...
Gerhard Brewka