The AGM postulates for belief revision, augmented by the DP postulates for iterated belief revision, provide generally accepted criteria for the design of operators by which intel...
Since belief revision deals with the interaction of belief and information over time, branching-time temporal logic seems a natural setting for a theory of belief change. We propo...
The study of belief revision and reasoning about actions have been two of the most active areas of research in AI. Both these areas involve reasoning about change. However very li...
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI.In recent years two special cases ofbelief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in ...
Belief Revision is a ubiquitous process underlying many forms of intelligent behaviour. The AGM paradigm is a powerful framework for modeling and implementing belief revision syst...
Epistemic and doxastic modal logics (Hintikka [1962]), and the logics of theory change and belief revision (Alchourr6net. al. [1985], Giirdenfors [1988]) are used for the represen...
Research in belief revision has been dominated by work that lies firmly within the classic AGM paradigm, characterized by a well-known set of postulates governing the behavior of ...
In this paper we study the relation between two approaches to information change: Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Belief Revision. One of the main differences between these approaches...
Hans P. van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van der Hoek, Barteld...
This paper presents a logical framework for negotiation based on belief revision theory. We consider that a negotiation process is a course or multiple courses of mutual belief re...
Dongmo Zhang, Norman Y. Foo, Thomas Andreas Meyer,...
Logics of action, for reasoning about the effects of state change, and logics of belief, accounting for belief revision and update, have much in common. Furthermore, we may underta...