LICS
2012
IEEE
11 years 7 months ago
2012
IEEE
—A novel countermodel-producing decision procedure that applies to several multi-modal logics, both intuitionistic and classical, is presented. Based on backwards search in label...
CSFW
2012
IEEE
11 years 7 months ago
2012
IEEE
—We show that Kripke semantics of modal logic, manifest in the syntactic proof formalism of labeled sequent calculi, can be used to solve three central problems in access control...
ENTCS
2008
13 years 5 months ago
2008
We study sequent calculi for propositional modal logics, interpreted over coalgebras, with admissibility of cut being the main result. As applications we present a new proof of th...
COLING
1994
13 years 6 months ago
1994
We discuss some consequence relations in DRT useful to discourse semantics. We incorporate some consequence relations into DRT using sequent calculi. We also show some connections...
FROCOS
2000
Springer
13 years 8 months ago
2000
Springer
We define a sound and complete logic, called FO , which extends classical first-order predicate logic with intuitionistic implication. As expected, to allow the interpretation of i...
ISMVL
1993
IEEE
13 years 9 months ago
1993
IEEE
A construction principle for natural deduction systems for arbitrary finitely-many-valued first order logics is exhibited. These systems are systematically obtained from sequent...
TABLEAUX
1999
Springer
13 years 9 months ago
1999
Springer
Abstract. We define sequent-style calculi for nominal tense logics characterized by classes of modal frames that are first-order definable by certain Π0 1 -formulae and Π0 2 -...
CSL
2007
Springer
13 years 11 months ago
2007
Springer
Abstract. Sequent calculi usually provide a general deductive setting that uniformly embeds other proof-theoretical approaches, such as tableaux methods, resolution techniques, goa...
CSL
2009
Springer
13 years 11 months ago
2009
Springer
We develop a polarised variant of Curien and Herbelin’s ¯λµ˜µ calculus suitable for sequent calculi that admit a focalising cut elimination (i.e. whose proofs are focalised ...