Sciweavers

ICICS
2010
Springer
13 years 1 months ago
Proving Coercion-Resistance of Scantegrity II
By now, many voting protocols have been proposed that, among others, are designed to achieve coercion-resistance, i.e., resistance to vote buying and voter coercion. Scantegrity II...
Ralf Küsters, Tomasz Truderung, Andreas Vogt
JCSS
2010
112views more  JCSS 2010»
13 years 2 months ago
Towards a dichotomy for the Possible Winner problem in elections based on scoring rules
To make a joint decision, agents (or voters) are often required to provide their preferences as linear orders. To determine a winner, the given linear orders can be aggregated acc...
Nadja Betzler, Britta Dorn
ATAL
2006
Springer
13 years 7 months ago
Junta distributions and the average-case complexity of manipulating elections
Encouraging voters to truthfully reveal their preferences in an election has long been an important issue. Previous studies have shown that some voting protocols are hard to manip...
Ariel D. Procaccia, Jeffrey S. Rosenschein
FC
2005
Springer
88views Cryptology» more  FC 2005»
13 years 9 months ago
Small Coalitions Cannot Manipulate Voting
We demonstrate how to make voting protocols resistant against manipulation by computationally bounded malicious voters, by extending the previous results of Conitzer and Sandholm i...
Edith Elkind, Helger Lipmaa