Sciweavers

AUTOMATICA
2002

Closed-loop identification with an unstable or nonminimum phase controller

13 years 4 months ago
Closed-loop identification with an unstable or nonminimum phase controller
In many practical cases, the identification of a system is done in closed loop with some controller. In this paper, we show that the internal stability of the resulting model, in closed loop with the same controller, is not always guaranteed if this controller is unstable and/or nonminimum phase, and that the classical closed-loop prediction-error identification methods present different properties regarding this stability issue. With some of these methods, closed-loop instability of the identified model is actually guaranteed. This is a serious drawback if this model is to be used for the design of a new controller. We give guidelines to avoid the emergence of this instability problem; these guidelines concern both the experiment design and the choice of the identification method. Key words: closed-loop identification, internal stability, unstable or nonminimum phase controller, control design.
Benoît Codrons, Brian D. O. Anderson, Michel
Added 16 Dec 2010
Updated 16 Dec 2010
Type Journal
Year 2002
Where AUTOMATICA
Authors Benoît Codrons, Brian D. O. Anderson, Michel Gevers
Comments (0)