Sciweavers

AMSTERDAM
2009

Supplements within a Unidimensional Semantics I: Scope

13 years 2 months ago
Supplements within a Unidimensional Semantics I: Scope
Potts (2005, 2007) claims that Grice's `conventional implicatures' offer a powerful argument in favor of a multidimensional semantics, one in which certain expressions fail to interact scopally with various operators because their meaning is located in a separate dimension. Focusing on NonRestrictive Relative Clauses (= NRRs), we explore an alternative to Potts's bidimensional account. In our analysis, (1) NRRs can be syntactically attached with matrix scope, despite their appearance in embedded positions; (2) NRRs can in some cases be syntactically attached within the scope of other operators (whether attitudinal or not), in which case they semantically interact with them; (3) NRRs are semantically conjoined with the rest of the sentence, but (4) they are subject to a pragmatic rule that requires that their content be relatively easy to accommodate
Philippe Schlenker
Added 16 Feb 2011
Updated 16 Feb 2011
Type Journal
Year 2009
Where AMSTERDAM
Authors Philippe Schlenker
Comments (0)