Sciweavers

Free Online Productivity Tools i2Speak i2Symbol i2OCR iTex2Img iWeb2Print iWeb2Shot i2Type iPdf2Split iPdf2Merge i2Bopomofo i2Arabic i2Style i2Image i2PDF iLatex2Rtf Sci2ools

16

SIGMOD
2008
ACM

favoriteEmaildiscussreport

158views Database» more SIGMOD 2008»

How NOT to review a paper: the tools and techniques of the adversarial reviewer

14 years 4 months ago

How NOT to review a paper: the tools and techniques of the adversarial reviewer

Download dimacs.rutgers.edu

There are several useful guides available for how to review a paper in Computer Science [10, 6, 12, 7, 2]. These are soberly presented, carefully reasoned and sensibly argued. As a result, they are not much fun. So, as a contrast, this note is a checklist of how not to review a paper. It details techniques that are unethical, unfair, or just plain nasty. Since in Computer Science we often present arguments about how an adversary would approach a particular problem, this note describes the adversary's strategy.

Graham Cormode

Real-time Traffic

Computer Science | Database | SIGMOD 2008 |

claim paper

Related Content

» Tightening the net A review of current and next generation spam filtering tools

» Building Systematic Reviews Using Automatic Text Classification Techniques

» IT Governance Reviewing 17 IT Governance Tools and Analysing the Case of Novozymes AS

» IPSViz An AfterAction Review Tool for HumanVirtual Human Experiences

» Architecture and Design Pattern Discovery Techniques A Review

» Collaboration between Writer and Reviewer through Change Representation Tools

» Assigning Polarity Scores to Reviews Using Machine Learning Techniques

» Review of imagebased rendering techniques

» Detecting group review spam

Post Info
More Details (n/a)

Added	08 Dec 2009
Updated	08 Dec 2009
Type	Conference
Year	2008
Where	SIGMOD
Authors	Graham Cormode

Comments (0)