Sciweavers

16 search results - page 1 / 4
» Reasoning about the Appropriateness of Proponents for Argume...
Sort
View
AAAI
2008
13 years 7 months ago
Reasoning about the Appropriateness of Proponents for Arguments
Formal approaches to modelling argumentation provide ways to present arguments and counterarguments, and to evaluate which arguments are, in a formal sense, warranted. While these...
Anthony Hunter
AI
2007
Springer
13 years 4 months ago
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
We present a formal, mathematical model of argument structure and evaluation, taking seriously the procedural and dialogical aspects of argumentation. The model applies proof stan...
Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Douglas Walton
COMMA
2006
13 years 6 months ago
The Carneades Argumentation Framework - Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions
Abstract. In 2005, Gordon and Walton presented initial ideas for a computational model of defeasible argument [12, 26], which builds on and elaborates Walton's theory of argum...
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton
ARGMAS
2006
Springer
13 years 8 months ago
Specification and Complexity of Strategic-Based Reasoning Using Argumentation
Abstract. In this paper, we propose a new strategic and tactic reasoning for agent communication. This reasoning framework is specified using argumentation theory combined to a rel...
Mohamed Mbarki, Jamal Bentahar, Bernard Moulin
EGOV
2004
Springer
13 years 10 months ago
PARMENIDES: Facilitating Democratic Debate
Abstract. This paper describes PARMENIDES, a system which facilitates structured debate about government policy. 1 The PARMENIDES System The last two decades have seen a deliberati...
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Peter Mc...