Hyperincident connected components of tagging networks

13 years 6 months ago
Hyperincident connected components of tagging networks
Data created by social bookmarking systems can be described as 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs connecting documents, users, and tags (tagging networks), such that the toolbox of complex network analysis can be applied to examine their properties. One of the most basic tools, the analysis of connected components, however cannot be applied meaningfully: Tagging networks tend to be almost entirely connected. We therefore propose a generalization of connected components, m-hyperincident connected components. We show that decomposing tagging networks into 2-hyperincident connected components yields a characteristic component distribution with a salient giant component that can be found across various datasets. This pattern changes if the underlying formation process changes, for example, if the hypergraph is constructed from search logs, or if the tagging data is contaminated by spam: It turns out that the second- to 129th largest components of the spam-labeled Bibsonomy dataset are inhabi...
Nicolas Neubauer, Klaus Obermayer
Added 28 May 2010
Updated 28 May 2010
Type Conference
Year 2009
Where HT
Authors Nicolas Neubauer, Klaus Obermayer
Comments (0)