Sciweavers

EUROCRYPT
1999
Springer

Software Performance of Universal Hash Functions

13 years 10 months ago
Software Performance of Universal Hash Functions
Abstract. This paper compares the parameters sizes and software performance of several recent constructions for universal hash functions: bucket hashing, polynomial hashing, Toeplitz hashing, division hashing, evaluation hashing, and MMH hashing. An objective comparison between these widely varying approaches is achieved by defining constructions that offer a comparable security level. It is also demonstrated how the security of these constructions compares favorably to existing MAC algorithms, the security of which is less understood.
Wim Nevelsteen, Bart Preneel
Added 04 Aug 2010
Updated 04 Aug 2010
Type Conference
Year 1999
Where EUROCRYPT
Authors Wim Nevelsteen, Bart Preneel
Comments (0)