Sciweavers

436 search results - page 12 / 88
» Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents
Sort
View
89
Voted
JAIR
2008
104views more  JAIR 2008»
14 years 9 months ago
On the Qualitative Comparison of Decisions Having Positive and Negative Features
Making a decision is often a matter of listing and comparing positive and negative arguments. In such cases, the evaluation scale for decisions should be considered bipolar, that ...
Didier Dubois, Hélène Fargier, Jean-...
AIL
2005
134views more  AIL 2005»
14 years 9 months ago
Legal Case-based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning
In this paper we apply a general account of practical reasoning to arguing about legal cases. In particular, we provide a reconstruction of the reasoning of the majority and dissen...
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
AAAI
2000
14 years 11 months ago
Towards a Logic-Based Theory of Argumentation
There are a number of frameworks for modelling argumentation in logic. They incorporate formal representation of individual arguments and techniques for comparing conflicting argu...
Philippe Besnard, Anthony Hunter
ATAL
2010
Springer
14 years 10 months ago
To teach or not to teach?: decision making under uncertainty in ad hoc teams
In typical multiagent teamwork settings, the teammates are either programmed together, or are otherwise provided with standard communication languages and coordination protocols. ...
Peter Stone, Sarit Kraus
ARGMAS
2004
Springer
15 years 2 months ago
On the Generation of Bipolar Goals in Argumentation-Based Negotiation
The notion of agent’s goals is crucial in negotiation dialogues. In fact, during a negotiation, each agent tries to make and to accept the offers which satisfy its own goals. Wor...
Leila Amgoud, Souhila Kaci