Sciweavers

890 search results - page 18 / 178
» Comparative expert reviews
Sort
View
CORR
2010
Springer
58views Education» more  CORR 2010»
14 years 9 months ago
Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing
Today's peer review process for scientic articles is unnecessarily opaque and oers few incentives to referees. Likewise, the publishing process is unnecessarily inecient and i...
Axel Boldt
136
Voted
JCISE
2002
512views more  JCISE 2002»
14 years 9 months ago
Definition and Review of Virtual Prototyping
Virtual Prototyping (VP) technique has been interpreted in many different ways, which causes confusion and misunderstanding among researchers and practitioners. Based on a review ...
G. Gary Wang
TSE
2010
280views more  TSE 2010»
14 years 7 months ago
How Reliable Are Systematic Reviews in Empirical Software Engineering?
BACKGROUND – the systematic review is becoming a more commonly employed research instrument in empirical software engineering. Before undue reliance is placed on the outcomes of...
Stephen G. MacDonell, Martin J. Shepperd, Barbara ...
GPEM
2010
104views more  GPEM 2010»
14 years 8 months ago
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines: ten years of reviews
The journal and in particular the resource reviews have been running for ten years. There are a number of activities being planned to celebrate. However it is a good time to revisi...
William B. Langdon, Steven M. Gustafson
SIGIR
2012
ACM
12 years 12 months ago
Cognos: crowdsourcing search for topic experts in microblogs
Finding topic experts on microblogging sites with millions of users, such as Twitter, is a hard and challenging problem. In this paper, we propose and investigate a new methodolog...
Saptarshi Ghosh, Naveen Kumar Sharma, Fabrí...