Sciweavers

2884 search results - page 241 / 577
» Evaluating learning algorithms and classifiers
Sort
View
89
Voted
CLEF
2010
Springer
15 years 1 months ago
Combining Semantics and Statistics for Patent Classification
For the patent classification task of the 2010 CLEF-IP evaluation we have used three different approaches combining semantics and statistics-driven techniques: first approach is b...
Franck Derieux, Mihaela Bobeica, Delphine Pois, Je...
86
Voted
CORR
2002
Springer
79views Education» more  CORR 2002»
15 years 11 days ago
Technical Note: Bias and the Quantification of Stability
Research on bias in machine learning algorithms has generally been concerned with the impact of bias on predictive accuracy. We believe that there are other factors that should al...
Peter D. Turney
DMIN
2008
190views Data Mining» more  DMIN 2008»
15 years 2 months ago
Optimization of Self-Organizing Maps Ensemble in Prediction
The knowledge discovery process encounters the difficulties to analyze large amount of data. Indeed, some theoretical problems related to high dimensional spaces then appear and de...
Elie Prudhomme, Stéphane Lallich
94
Voted
FGR
2006
IEEE
131views Biometrics» more  FGR 2006»
15 years 6 months ago
Haar Features for FACS AU Recognition
We examined the effectiveness of using Haar features and the Adaboost boosting algorithm for FACS action unit (AU) recognition. We evaluated both recognition accuracy and processi...
Jacob Whitehill, Christian W. Omlin
ICML
2004
IEEE
16 years 1 months ago
Leveraging the margin more carefully
Boosting is a popular approach for building accurate classifiers. Despite the initial popular belief, boosting algorithms do exhibit overfitting and are sensitive to label noise. ...
Nir Krause, Yoram Singer