Sciweavers

1912 search results - page 34 / 383
» On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
Sort
View
JELIA
2010
Springer
14 years 10 months ago
Sets of Boolean Connectives That Make Argumentation Easier
Abstract. Many proposals for logic-based formalizations of argumentation consider an argument as a pair (Φ, α), where the support Φ is understood as a minimal consistent subset ...
Nadia Creignou, Johannes Schmidt, Michael Thomas, ...
KR
2000
Springer
15 years 3 months ago
Finding Admissible and Preferred Arguments Can be Very Hard
Bondarenko et al. have recently proposed an extension of the argumentation-theoretic semantics of admissible and preferred arguments, originally proposed for logic programming onl...
Yannis Dimopoulos, Bernhard Nebel, Francesca Toni
AAAI
2007
15 years 2 months ago
Action-Based Alternating Transition Systems for Arguments about Action
This paper presents a formalism to describe practical reasoning in terms of an Action-based Alternating Transition System (AATS). The starting point is a previously specified acc...
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
ATAL
2009
Springer
15 years 6 months ago
Dialogues that account for different perspectives in collaborative argumentation
It is often the case that agents within a system have distinct types of knowledge. Furthermore, whilst common goals may be agreed upon, the particular representations of the indiv...
Elizabeth Black, Katie Atkinson
DEON
2010
Springer
15 years 4 months ago
Value-Based Argumentation for Justifying Compliance
Compliance is often achieved ‘by design’ through a coherent system of controls consisting of information systems and procedures . This system-based control requires a new appro...
Brigitte Burgemeestre, Joris Hulstijn, Yao-Hua Tan