Sciweavers

2303 search results - page 32 / 461
» On the logic of argumentation theory
Sort
View
NMR
2004
Springer
15 years 7 months ago
Combining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework
conflicts between goals and plans in Dung’s abstract argumentation framework. Argumentation theory has traditionally been used to deal with conflicts between defaults and beli...
Joris Hulstijn, Leendert W. N. van der Torre
ATAL
2006
Springer
15 years 5 months ago
Trust and honour in information-based agency
An argumentation based negotiation model is supported by information theory. Argumentative dialogues change the models of agents with respect to ongoing relationships between them...
Carles Sierra, John K. Debenham
105
Voted
AIL
2006
92views more  AIL 2006»
15 years 2 months ago
PARMENIDES: Facilitating Deliberation in Democracies
Governments and other groups interested in the views of citizens require the means to present justifications of proposed actions, and the means to solicit public opinion concerning...
Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Peter Mc...
ECAI
2004
Springer
15 years 7 months ago
Extending Defeasible Logic and Defeasible Prolog
Abstract. Defeasible logic (DL) promotes enthymemic, argumentative reasoning on incomplete set of premisses retracted on the presence of contrary information. Defeasible Prolog (d-...
Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen
ICAIL
2011
ACM
14 years 1 months ago
On the relationship between Carneades and Defeasible Logic
We study the formal relationships between the inferential aspects of Carneades (a general argumentation framework) and Defeasible Logic. The outcome of the investigation is that t...
Guido Governatori