Sciweavers

GECCO
2005
Springer
126views Optimization» more  GECCO 2005»

Is negative selection appropriate for anomaly detection?

15 years 10 months ago
Is negative selection appropriate for anomaly detection?
Negative selection algorithms for hamming and real-valued shape-spaces are reviewed. Problems are identified with the use of these shape-spaces, and the negative selection algorithm in general, when applied to anomaly detection. A straightforward self detector classification principle is proposed and its classification performance is compared to a real-valued negative selection algorithm and to a one-class support vector machine. Earlier work suggests that realvalue negative selection requires a single class to learn from. The investigations presented in this paper reveal, however, that when applied to anomaly detection, the real-valued negative selection and self detector classification techniques require positive and negative examples to achieve a high classification accuracy. Whereas, one-class SVMs only require examples from a single class. Categories and Subject Descriptors I.5.2 [Pattern Recognition]: Design Methodology—Classifier design and evaluation, Pattern analysis ...
Thomas Stibor, Philipp H. Mohr, Jonathan Timmis, C
Added 27 Jun 2010
Updated 27 Jun 2010
Type Conference
Year 2005
Where GECCO
Authors Thomas Stibor, Philipp H. Mohr, Jonathan Timmis, Claudia Eckert
Comments (0)